• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    52 minutes ago

    So it is not just AI slop, it is bad AI slop. They didn’t even spend the money to find someone who is capable to write the right prompts.

  • maus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    And the ad did exactly what it was intended to do. Getting everyone to talk about it. Any attention, is good attention, when their advertising is literally there to remind you that they exist.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Hmm, yes, because the world is definitely in danger of forgetting about the obscure brand – checks notes – “Coca Cola.”

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It reminded me that garbage exists and that I will continue to never buy it. Now I just hate it even more.

  • PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    So, legally, since AI output is public domain, Pepsi (or someone else) could theoretically take this trailer and replace all the Coke logos with Pepsi, and then republish it as theirs, couldn’t they?

  • zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    A sloth and panda also make an appearance, animals that are commonly seen in winter environments.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It matters a little more I think, because Coke’s aesthetic is a part of “Americana” - people collect vintage Coke advertising. (And it’s a broad enough hobby to have niches; I had a professor that was specifically focused on how African Americans have been depicted in Coke ads in his collecting)

      If you put any stock into what capitalism promises - Coke ads are supposed to be the best of the best. Coke doesn’t need to advertise to inform you that Coke exists. Coke holiday ads are supposed to be a spectacle, to encourage you to associate things like Christmas itself with the soda. Their advertising has changed how Americans picture Santa even. There were good artists who got paid, and you got advertising that was more to be trying to make you feel positive feelings/some appreciation of the aesthetics.

      It’s just another symptom of late stage capitalism - that the interaction between the business and the customer must be hostile. They can’t pretend that their advertising is meant to be for our benefit. Like yeah, obviously as cynic lemmings we know advertisers are always full of shit, but I think for most normies the Coke ads have always been at least mildly interesting part of seeing a movie during the Christmas season.

      • Rooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        32 minutes ago

        There are a couple of placeholder ads put on billboards by the billboard company where I live, and one of them literally says “can’t block this ad, huh?” The hostiliy has become palpable.

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They spent millions on this and did something like 27,000 prompts just to get this. It would have hasne cheaper and easier to just hire an animation team

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Can you please make a version of this where the pictures on the right are higher resolution? Perhaps 2x?