• tym@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      remember to sear your LLM for 5 min on each side to really lock in the tokenization…

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Since everyone here is talking about the connection between AI refusal and veganism… How’s your approach towards eating animals? I mean there’s more reasons to avoid AI. But I think when talking about climate change in specific… I try not to eat too much beef and I try not to use too much AI because both have a large CO2 footprint… And I think it’s also ethics considerations in both cases which make something undesirable. Do you do similar things or do you think it’s fundamentally different?

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    “[Generative AI] constantly steals without consent from absolutely everything, violates privacy, and obtains money from it,” Marc, a 23-year-old AI abstainer based in Spain , told Euronews Next.

    “It’s a tool of capitalism to maintain worker exploitation or even bring it up to the next level”.

    That brings back some of my faith in humanity.

    …I need to stop complaining about Gen Z.

  • Jared White ✌️ [HWC]@humansare.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    My teen has already been through the hype cycle. Was super into chatbots…until they were not. My preteen has never been even tempted, thought it was stupid from the get-go. From the mouth of babes…!

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      We don’t give kids enough credit.

      I remember news bringing up similar stuff when I was young, or like existential worries over TikTok more recently.

      But… kids are sharp. They’re adaptable. They often sniff out stupid trends faster than adults do, especially artifical ones like AI hype.

      • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        But then again they did also fall into using stuff like tiktok and oversharing on it with their names and faces and installing the app on their phone. Not just tiktok but meta stuff like Instagram and Twitter.

        I think best balance was during the phase where usernames were used on message boards and people were wary of sharing more beyond that on the Internet, and mantras like be careful what you share on the Internet was more common.

        Now days, people are sharing lot of information that marketers and companies had to work really hard to try to get. Now companies get names, voices, and faces given to them without effort.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          This is verging onto old internet nostalgia, and while I agree with the sentiment and love the old internet… it was a trash fire.

          And not safe.

          Someone vividly this out to me recently, and then I looked though archives of old threads. I was a moron on the internet in the 2000s, more than I realized.

          I guess what I’m saying is: yeah, the Big Tech grip seems bad. It is bad. But today’s kids will probably deal with it better than we expect, and whatever kids get into 20 years from now will be unspeakable, I’m sure.

          I’m honestly more worried about boomers, who don’t seem to be adapting to this stuff unless they were already IT folks.

  • LostWanderer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Abstainer would do a lot better of a job of giving credence to people actively avoiding AI usage due to ethical or environmental reasons; the sad reality of using either Luddite or Vegan to describe these people is due to the active negative messaging that people wanting to push unregulated technological change have charged these words with. Though, Luddite would be the best word to describe the people who are against using AI in daily life.

    As it’s potential to cause harm is great; there are still cases people killing themselves ChatGPT Killed Again-Four more Dead, AI-Induced Psychosis for example. Healthy technological advancement is necessary for the benefit of all human beings, however, what we are seeing with “AI” isn’t following that model. It’s good that people are standing against AI, since nothing will change unless people fight against Silicon Valley’s agenda.

    • 9bananas@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      great sentiment!

      …but the youngest of Gen Z is 20+ years old… definitely no longer kids.

      let’s please not make the same mistake as with millennials?

      • jh34ghu43gu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        The youngest gen z is ~13 and the oldest is ~28 so definitely some kids still there; majority adults, although if the whole ‘brain not mature until ~25’ metric is used then that’s a minority.

        • 9bananas@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          damn, it goes on way longer than i thought;

          i thought it’s about 10 years, but it’s actually 15…

  • thatonecoder@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Comparing the Anti-LLM and LIM movement to veganism is definitely something. Either way, age prohibition is not a good idea; rather, educating people about how to responsibly use technology is.