Ah. Plurality, neither royal nor intended to include entities beyond this body.

Not… that this one is aware of?

What drama are you envisioning?

We actually fairly recently had a severe mental event, and since then, frequently read sarcasm as serious on the first pass and sometimes for some time after.

It fucking sucks from this side, too. We just go charging at someone and then have to be like, oh, uh, sorry, guess I was socially stupid!

We can at least take some solace in knowing we all hate the situation together?

Part of him being charisma incarnate is having exactly zero fucks to give about how his appearance differs from conventional attractiveness.

Part of the incel anticharisma comes from obsessing over how some facet of your appearance means never getting laid.

Turns out just being chill about shit is sexy AF.

It all means something.

The first case is when it has limited samples on a particular topic, leaving it with insufficient data - “epistemically uncertain”

The second is when it tries to think about something, but it doesn’t have the ability to hold it in mind, the thought is in some way too large, that’s representational capacity.

The last is just, factoring stupid large numbers, and things of that nature.

We’re not going to read this one deeply, because we’re pretty sure this was demonstrated a while ago. Cool for OAI to catch up with the current state of the field, we guess?