In my country (and in many othets I suspect), the number of pupils per teacher keeps increasing. It’s really hard to individualize teaching when you have 30 pupils :(

Sure sure. But we’re defunding all that under the current administration, so its a moot point.

Just a quick comment that I am not american ;)

If there really were a single dimension axis of smartness, won’t there be a “smartest” and a “least smart” in every classroom? And if they’re in the wrong class and they leave, won’t there be two new pupils at the extremes? This argument of “you’re in the wrong class” always sounded elitist to me.

The important is that the teacher tailors the teaching to the students. Spend more time on the ones who struggle, give extra stuff to do to the quickest (e.g. help teaching to other pupils).

I’ve also always been against separating children by “intelligence”. Having a “smart” class and a “dumb” class is a self-fulfilling prophecy.

That being said, there are children who have special needs and who require a teacher who has the proper formation to help them.

The fact that their proportional share was 23% in the legislative election and now has 12% is not indicative that support for them diminished?

Certainly they are neutral evil, no? Can’t have market monopoly without rules. Wouldn’t go as far as lawful evil because they ain’t afraid of breaking no law.

Fucking hell, y’all make me realize how lucky I am with my bank that runs without gapps.

Wow, I admit that’s reaally bad 😅

Damn… The two extremes of the cyberpunk dystopia: no tech at all vs tech slavery.

Some people have no smartphone at all. How can they be customers at your bank?