Someone should manufacture a 1mm thin phone by disassembling one and mounting the screen at a 90 degree angle to the rest of the components, as that’s apparently how we measure “thickness” these days.
If being thin was the penultimate then we’d all use pens/pencils thinner than toothpicks. At a certain point you’re no longer ergonomic for human hands.
I mean, people might want it…if it were a decent product. But, good in terms of engineering though it may be, both the base model ($200) cheaper snd the pro model ($100) more expensive have much better specs.
Sk you have to make a trade-off in terms of specs just for the thinness. And I’d have thought that even most people who’d want a thin phone would prefer better value for money in terms of features.
Good, nobody wants a paper thin phone. You have to put an extra thick case on it just to make in comfortable to hold.
Maybe people would want an ultra thin phone, but not when it has a giant tumour that makes it actually almost twice as thick as an iPhone 6.
Someone should manufacture a 1mm thin phone by disassembling one and mounting the screen at a 90 degree angle to the rest of the components, as that’s apparently how we measure “thickness” these days.
If being thin was the penultimate then we’d all use pens/pencils thinner than toothpicks. At a certain point you’re no longer ergonomic for human hands.
honestly I somewhat prefer the thin phone; new operating system is booty cheeks though
I mean, people might want it…if it were a decent product. But, good in terms of engineering though it may be, both the base model ($200) cheaper snd the pro model ($100) more expensive have much better specs.
Sk you have to make a trade-off in terms of specs just for the thinness. And I’d have thought that even most people who’d want a thin phone would prefer better value for money in terms of features.