Actual technical articles about LLM/diffusion would be interesting to read (I think?)… maybe something like [vibecoding]?
Actually, let’s make that generic and use [futurology], so that it may apply regardless of whether the incumbent revolution/menace is LLMs, low code tools, or stack overflow.
I feared thus would be about AI, but… this might actually be interesting! I’m glad I started reading.
Well f*ck you and give me back the time I wasted on that article.
Guys, can we add a rule that all posts that deal with using LLM bots to code must be marked? I am sick of this topic.
How would you like them to be marked? AFAIK Lemmy doesn’t support post tags
Could put [AI Subject] in the title.
Actual technical articles about LLM/diffusion would be interesting to read (I think?)… maybe something like [vibecoding]?
Actually, let’s make that generic and use [futurology], so that it may apply regardless of whether the incumbent revolution/menace is LLMs, low code tools, or stack overflow.