• grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s the difference between spending money to have your will enacted, and having your money taken by the people, for use of the commons.

      The latter is a very dangerous precedent to set. You don’t want the people feeling like they can have their will enacted.

    • DandomRude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I can’t say how the tax avoidance strategies of the super-rich work in practice, but in any case, their feigned philanthropy is a key part of it.

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s not.

        This is a common misconception based on meme level reasoning.

        I don’t know how this works but I know I don’t like billionaires.

        • DandomRude@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          You need to be more specific. I’m not going to waste my time refuting your statement because I can’t even begin to imagine how you came up with that.

          • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            That makes two of us I guess.

            You said that you don’t know how it works, I can’t really respond to that.

            • DandomRude@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              You said that philanthropy is not misused to avoid taxes—that is definitely wrong, but if you want to believe it, please do.