• CXORA@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    308
    ·
    29 days ago

    People who share the size of a codechange as a mark of how effective ai coding agents are truly missing the point of code changes.

    • Klear@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      29 days ago

      I’m just a hobbyist, but I’m always more proud of commits that remove stuff.

      • traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        28 days ago

        Removing shit and it still working perfectly the same is absolutely a goal everyone should have. Less code means less to maintain.

      • sqw@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        i refactored some web code i wrote ten years ago and it’s more elegant and a tenth the size with new features because of language advancements. feels great.

    • Redkey@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      28 days ago

      You reminded me of a story I recently read, where the author highlighted just how much awesome programming someone had done by describing how their hands were cramping up.

      It’s like estimating how well an artist paints by looking at how much paint is on their clothes, or judging how good a cook is by how many cuts and burns they have. The actions that cause those things are incidental to the process, not central, and an excessive amount points to incompetence, not hard and skillful work.

    • Ech@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      29 days ago

      Might as well be bragging about pictures they’ve taken of their bowel movements.