I need to scan very large JSONL files efficiently and am considering a parallel grep-style approach over line-delimited text.

Would love to hear how you would design it.

  • Bazell@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Splitting file in equal parts and analyzing in threads each part is basically the only efficient option to utilize modern CPU architectures efficiently for your task that I can think about. Since I doubt that the data stored in your files can be quickly processed by the GPU(I assume that you have text data).

    • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Can a file really be split efficiently? And is reading from multiple files on the same disk really faster than scanning a single file from top to bottom?

      • entwine@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        You don’t actually need to “split” anything, you just read from different offsets per thread. Mmap might be the most efficient way to do this (or at least the easiest)

        Whether or not that’s going to run into hardware bottlenecks is a separate issue from designing a parallel algorithm. Idk what OP is trying to accomplish, but if their hardware is known (eg this is an internal tool meant to run in a data center), they’ll need to read up on their hardware and virtualization architecture to squeeze the most IO performance.

        But if parsing is actually the bottleneck, there’s a lot you can do to optimize it in software. Simdjson would be a good place to start.

      • Bazell@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        If the task to just read the data quickly without processing it(doing calculations, sorting, transformation, etc.), then yes, reading line by line is the fastest way. But the OP mentioned some processing operations on data, which may require additional time and computing power, thus it will be efficient to firstly load file into ram splitting it into chunks, give each thread a chunk to process and then combine results.

        In fact, my first comment suggested that you can read file line by line and once enough lines were read in RAM, thread 1 can start processing them while thread 0 still reads new lines from hard drive. Once another chunk is ready, thread 2 can start processing it and so on.

        In conclusion, it all depends on what exactly you need to do with data. Simply transferring it from HDD to RAM must be done by reading line by line. But processing of data can be split among cores of CPU to maximize the speed of computations.

        • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Don’t have a thread doing line by line file reads, just to have it in memory. There is a piece of software optimized for tasks like this, the OS.
          Just mmap your file and start processing.

          • Bazell@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 minutes ago

            Depends on programming language and built in methods that are being used. I described in a more fundamental way how it may work assuming, that OS itself will eventually use at least 1 thread to read a file. From my perspective of view, this will be our main body thread in which will be a cycle, that reads file line by line and gives ready chunks for other threads to process. As I described in other comment somewhere here, we can simplify this pipeline into firstly read the file into RAM splitting it into pieces. And only then process in parallel. I agree that second approach is more convenient one and easier to implement.