• vandsjov@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    If you dont think people can get issues from watching things, you should look up issues people have gotten from having a job of reviewing flagged content on social media sites.

    I’m a little confused at what you’re writing, as it seems like you think the children that should choose if they should access a porn (or other adult content) site. They will of cause continue to watch. Just like they would eat doughnuts as a meal all the time if they had the choice.

    • Speiser0@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      If you dont think people can get issues from watching things

      I do not not think this.

      it seems like you think the children that should choose if they should access a porn (or other adult content) site.

      Yes. The website should have a warning about its content (one could also make a law that it has to put more information there, about the risks and whatnot. we have this for other things). If the child is old enough to find such content and be curious, they’re probably mature enough to make their own decision.

      They will of cause continue to watch.

      If it’s that bad that it hurts them immediately, they won’t. And otherwise, it’s still not like they’d get addicted, and so I do not think a short exposure would have negative enough effects to strictly enforce age verification.

      Just like they would eat doughnuts as a meal all the time if they had the choice.

      Children are allowed to buy food (here in germany). They just need the money and access to a store.