• Spoomis@toast.ooo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    My biggest issue with this situation is: if they can get away with getting games they don’t like being delisted, where does it end? Delisting books with themes or authors they don’t like? Banning the sale of alcohol and cigarettes?

    • DegenerationIP@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Honestly haven’t thought so far. But Media lacks that, as almost everything is clickbait.

      And you got a point. There is questionable stuff. But killing off a whole area is like a bit shot on a small bird

  • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why are they doing a comprehensive audit on the content and not doing a comprehensive audit on new payment providers? I sure would be

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          What I meant is that simply excluding Mastercard and Visa would turn away tons of sales and donations, even if they worked with every other payment processor on the planet at once.

          They… could. But it would hurt, maybe even kill Itch.

    • Fontasia@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      My favourite fact is she thinks decriminalising sex work will lead to more sex trafficing.

        • Booboofinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Stuff like this is the strongest argument for a decentralized payment option. Hopefully some day crypto will not be so much a tool of monetary speculation and we can use it for that without having to have the same experience as the guy who bought a pizza with Bitcoin.

          • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s what I always wanted “DeFi” to be, a systematic replacement for the legions of evil old banks who have happily collaborated with the worst institutions of the last several centuries.

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Damn, Rupert Murdoch and now this asshole. Australia has a monopoly on ruining media, lol.

      • redwattlebird @lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can thank Advance Australia for that. Huge think tank that likely bank rolls all this nonsense and more.

        Also, down with Collective Shout! As someone who suffered child abuse, I condemn these cookers crusading under the guise of child protection. FFS, they were patting themselves on the back for stopping sales of plastic heads on Temu.

        • Wahots@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          If it’s any consolation, I’m sure the American versions (Focus on the family, alliance defending freedom) are right there with them.

          Props to them for figuring out a real way of imposing colonialism on impoverished countries and former colonies alike. Now their ideas and laws are spreading worldwide, like someone with diseases shitting into the local water supply. Ugh.

          I have a terrible feeling that the people they duped won’t figure this out for 30 years or more, with some trappings lasting for 50+ years.

  • Cyberflunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago
    Collective shout finacials
    year: 2024
    revenue: 458043
    employee_expenses: 107000
    other_expenses: 215488
    net_surplus: 135555
    employees: 
      total_fte: 2
      full_time: 0
      part_time: 1
      casual: 4
    volunteers: 15
    donations_and_bequests: 389800
    government_grants: 0
    commercial_income: 0
    expense_to_revenue_ratio: "70.4%"
    average_expense_per_employee: 39400
    
    Leadership
    - name: Melinda Tankard Reist
      role: Founder, Movement Director
      public_socials:
        - Twitter: @MelTankardReist
        - Instagram: @collective.shout
      public_email_address: Not publicly listed
      salary: Not publicly listed
    
    - name: Caitlin Roper
      role: Campaigns Manager
      public_socials:
        - Instagram: @collective.shout
      public_email_address: Not publicly listed
      salary: Not publicly listed
    
    - name: Renee Chopping
      role: Campaigns Strategy
      public_socials:
        - LinkedIn
      public_email_address: r******@collectiveshout.org
      salary: Not publicly listed
    
    - name: Lyn Swanson Kennedy
      role: Campaigns Strategy
      public_socials:
        - Instagram: @collective.shout
      public_email_address: Not publicly listed
      salary: Not publicly listed
    
    - name: Coralie Alison
      role: Movement Operations Manager
      public_socials:
        - Twitter: @CoralieAlison
        - Instagram: @collective.shout
      public_email_address: Not publicly listed
      salary: Not publicly listed
    
    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is exactly like the pearl-clutching we had back in the 1980’s around D&D and music lyrics. At least we moved the goalpost from satanic panic and thinly-veiled racism, over to “art that features sexual expression I don’t understand.”

      If history is any indicator, their actions are only going to increase awareness of this kind of stuff.

    • DeLacue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s already expanded. It started as going after “rape and incest” but now it’s all adult games. But a bunch of lgbtq games have already gotten hit. I am beyond furious.

    • SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      How do I tell politely in a letter to MasterCard, that if I want to buy a horse dildo it’s only MY fucking business?

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        buy a horse dildo with bitcoin and flaunt how they didn’t get any money from your transaction? idk man, i’m good at vague ideas, specifics are harder

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        most of the world isn’t american. we can’t do anything about your government

        • Mustakrakish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Capitalism is a global problem, its not contained to america. Replace neighbors being kidnapped with which ever country you’re in supporting a genocide and it still fits, and is likely accurate unless you’re like in Yemen.

  • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Transaction companies should not play police, in my opinion

    In fact no company should play being police

    This is why we have the digital market act

    How are transaction offering companies not included there? Who gives them the right to choose what people consume?

    Way do much centralised power

    Basically a dictatorship

    Fuck that

    • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, they have no problems offering transaction services to obvious scams like “find sex in your region” and other scammy find relationship websites.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      This will never go away. Payment processors make life easy for most consumers, people like them. And as long as we have them, they hold all the power around how money can be used. And they will always be limited by governments and local laws.

      If you don’t like the situation, use cash. If that’s too inconvenient Bitcoin is essentially your only other option.

      • bouh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        They have the power because states gave it to them. States can very easily take it back. But they won’t because they’re corrupted assholes.

        • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not even… They have the power because you gave it to them. States can take it away, but that’s worse, you don’t want that.

          But it doesn’t really matter, it’s all connected. The payment processors control how money can be used and the state controls how they’re allowed to let you use it. And you let it all happen by voluntarily using a credit card.

      • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Bitcoin, or maybe better the millions other way more efficient alternatives 😜

        Edit: “or better” instead of “and”, as I wanted to say that nearly any other crypto coin is more efficient than bitcoin. 😁

        Or i wanted to say, if you offer bitcoin payment , please offer alternative crypto coins as well…

        Not so sure anymore xD

        At least the main thing I wanted to say, is that bitcoin is very inefficient.

          • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I guess you interpreted my comment wrong…

            What I say is that basically any alternative crypto coin is way more efficient than bitcoin and thus it would be dumb to go for bitcoin compared to the trillion other crypto coins.

            ✌🏻

            • 9bananas@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              ah, that makes more sense!

              just as an aside, for future reference:

              you wrote,

              Bitcoin, and the millions other way more efficient alternatives 😜"

              when you really meant to write:

              Bitcoin, or the millions other way more efficient alternatives 😜"

              it may be s subtle difference, but when you write “and” it means bitcoin AND the other alternatives are efficient.

              when you use “or” instead, it means bitcoin OR the more efficient alternatives.

              so my interpretation was correct. you just didn’t write what you thought you did…

              • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Ohh, yea, guess that are symptoms of my native language being swiss german 😆 we use sometimes strange word-combinations for comparison of stuff

                Thank you for the head up!

                • 9bananas@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  hey, no worries!

                  just felt like it might be useful to know where the misunderstanding happened

                  i’m glad if it helped, cheers!

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    One of the great mysteries of the 21st century is how a tiny number of US companies control most of the world’s payment processing, when it’s not a technically difficult problem.

    You could implement an entire end-to-end payment processing system in a year with a team of a few dozen competent engineers. The only difficulty is getting banks and retailers to sign up to it, but when the big players charge so much and create so much trouble this doesn’t seem like it should be a tough sell. In most cases literally all you’d need to do is charge 2.4% instead of their 3%.

        • Wahots@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m so sick of this. What if we don’t want saving? Just fuck off.

          I’ve got friends in both places, and I highly doubt God is gonna give you extra karma or brownie points for converting someone to a made up religion that’s like, maybe 200 years old, lol.

          Go gardening. Volunteer at a big cat rescue place. Stop wasting your life preaching something that deep down, you probably don’t even believe in, but is distracting you from something else in your life that could be resolved with therapy.

      • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Bro for real! Like I hate any porn game, as a game. Not as a societal flaw!

        So you know what I do? Same exact thing I do about gay sex. I don’t do it, I don’t think about it very often unless there’s a funny joke to be made in a tangential way, and I don’t tell other people that they have to be exact like me.

        Ffs, let people do what they want if they aren’t hurting anyone.

        • Wahots@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          They cannot help it. They literally think about it all the time, and there’s no helping people like collective shout or the crazies on the street. The unwashed ones with the “you’re going to hell for gay sex” signs.

          I see the same people on the street all the time. And they think about gay sex WAY more than I do, and I’m married to a person of the same goddamn sex, lol.

          Some people really need to cut loose. Generally, I’m not pro-drugs, but damn, they need some hard party drugs to reset things and help them get back to a normal life. Go to burning man, get a good job, then go hike the Appalachian trail or something, for Christ sake.

          • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I would argue that instead of party drugs (which I assume is X, coke, alcohol, pot, and so on), I think they need a good ego death trip. I’m talking like twenty caps(or two wavy bois) or an LD50 of LSA.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, crypto is still not the answer so long as it is functionally a speculative asset even after all the proof efficiency improvements… Also it still has centralized points which keyholders could easily leverage.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Could someone just make, like, Raunchy Mastercard and just process payments from everyone including all the porn and weird shit that the other mainstream companies don’t want? It seems like the payment processors being puritanical dipshits is a weakness that could be exploited by an enterprising competitor.

    But then again, we’re talking about a natural monopoly that has been in place for decades at this point. I wouldn’t expect them to exactly play fair.

    • Corhen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The problem is that people like MC and visa would then ban you from sending money TO RaunchyCard.

      So it just moves the problem back a step.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I get not liking a game about SA and incest, but how about just not play that game?