this beeing in a contract does not mean it is enforceable. sounds like you are just assuming it is like this
edit: not to mention that the person you replied to said they dont even have a strongly worded contract in the first place like this
edit2: what i mean like it sounds like you are just guessing, and not knowing.
Anything you make on company equipment belongs to the company
do you actually know this or are you just assuming this is the law in denmark? or even the eu?
the corruption happening openly like always great
Andorid can be forked any day, can it not?
i am still not convinced about a linux phone.
Or rather this already exist, GrapheneOS is a thing. And they are even working on a partnership with an oem manufacturer.
I dont see what use case there is, that is not super niche, that justifis having and developing a “linux phone”, instead of an actual secure device, which graphenOs already provides.
this is just what i think, but it might be, that someone who questions gender identity, might also question capitalsim instead of just accepting the rethorics…
maybe i am wrong but i think a lot of people, me included, think that meeting someone is something that like just happens at some point, and then dont really know what to do if it just does not
oh i mean i too do like and support the advice to just not use the laptop for it
i just feel like that ~ anything made with company equipment belongs to the company ~ is not the law in denmark or in (some parts) eu, and multiple people made it sound like it is, so i just kind of wanted to know if they actually know this certainly (and your comment was most upvoted)🤷♂️