• 6 Posts
  • 117 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle






  • Generally, Paramount owns all Star Trek IP rights.

    However, reusing some things isn’t cost less. In some cases, they have to pay residuals to specific individuals or subcontractors who have creative rights.

    Historically, this has led to weirdness such as renaming the Locarno character from the TNG episode ’Lower Decks’, played by Robert Duncan McNeill, to become Tom Paris in Voyager because Paramount didn’t want to pay the writer who got scrip credit for the TNG episode ongoing residuals for creating the character.

    I don’t know enough about whether creators of animated character designs have rights to similar kinds of residuals, or the production houses like Titmouse for Lower Decks, but one has to wonder. It was so strange that Paramount+ suddenly said it was refocusing away from animation just as Skydance started its moves to acquire it.


  • As an animated Trek fan, that definitely irks, especially as it’s an animated sequence.

    I have a suspicion that there’s something about animated design IP rights behind the decision though.

    The old owners had decided to jettison animated Star Trek, and some other Paramount+ animated content to make the streamer mainly live action focused. Which, at the time this was announced, seemed very odd because Paramount’s owners were trying to sell the firm to Skydance, which is a major producer of high end animation for streamers.

    So, my thought is that Skydance wants its own animation studio to be doing any future animated content for Paramount. There will be exceptions for long running Nickelodeon animation such as SpongeBob, Beavis and Butthead or Dora the Explorer, but relatively recent creations will get short shrift.



  • Given the complete failure to produce and release anything for Star Trek in more than a decade on the cinematic side, I can’t think any reasonable senior executive would think now is the time to let Kurtzman go. All the more, the historic chaos in relaunching the television franchise in the early seasons of both TNG and Discovery have demonstrated that it’s just not possible to launch a new overall franchise runner without running major risks.

    Kurtzman’s got a reputation as being good to work with from both the studio/streamer and creative side. They don’t have any evidence to show he won’t adjust to new strategic direction.

    The question more will be how far will Kurtzman himself be willing to compromise if the Ellisons give high level direction that would take the franchise in a very different direction for television.

    What I do see is that some of the perceived failures will definitely lead to restricted opportunities for some of the EPs that have worked for Kurtzman. For example, Osunsami may not be given run of a project again after the S31 movie. Michelle Paradise won’t likely be asked to run another show in the franchise.



  • I’m not sure that it’s entirely accurate that there’s no hints of a renewal for Kurtzman’s and Secret Hideout.

    In the recent SFX magazine piece for Starfleet Academy, the Kurtzman quotes hinted vaguely at “Lots more Star Trek TV is in development”.

    “There’s quite a few exciting things in the works right now, but I’m not going to say more than that!”

    TrekMovie observes that, ‘The SFX article noted Kurtzman was “tight-lipped about future projects,” adding that the interview was done before the announcement that[ Jonathan Goldstein and John Francis Daley are developing a new Star Trek film.’

    Thinking back to the last 5-year extension, Kurtzman was asked to map out proposal for Star Trek’s television rollout for 5-7 years forward.

    Clearly, he was given clearance by the new ownership to pitch stuff towards another extension. Whether there’s any uptake is to be seen.

    I just keep coming back to the previous Paramount+ and streaming heads stripping the schedule back to the point that animation was being eliminated and the live action schedule was dominated by Taylor Sheridan.

    Now the new owners have a large and prestigious animation studio and Sheridan refused to renew.

    Meanwhile WB is fighting back against Skydance’s takeover effort to go with Netflix’s offer.

    If I had to guess, Paramount+ will see more new Star Trek animation and live action as complementary to the darker whatever that the creators of Stranger Things will bring.

    Kurtzman may get another but shorter extension until the movie franchise gets off the ground, but will be fenced to the 32nd century, animated shows, and shows from the 23rd and 24th century that won’t write new canon.


  • This seems to be just one more thing in development that hinges on the decisions David Ellison will make about the next decade for the franchise, or at least the next five years.

    Now that some of the new things that Ellison had been counting on to anchor Paramount+’s schedule (i.e. anything new from Taylor Sheridan) are complete nonstarters, perhaps there’s some room for some new Trek.

    Also, the relationship between Kurtzman and David Ellison goes back to when Kurtzman was a writer and Ellison was a producer on Into Darkness. There’s no sense of negativity between them.

    While Ellison hasn’t hesitated to finally cut the JJ Abrams movie contract that failed to meet deliverables, Kurtzman has delivered what CBS and Paramount wanted on television. There’s no reason to believe that they couldn’t come to a meeting of minds but there may be some of Secret Hideout’s long term EPs that might be let go in the process of a shift in direction.





  • I think that this is a spoiler that I don’t want to know before the premiere.

    I can see why they need to market it every way they can though.

    Their rollout is definitely showing progress compared to the last five years. The ViacomCBS/Paramount management of the shows seems to have locked everyone down but the showrunners and provided them virtually nothing for promotion.

    They really are having to push back against the naysayers though. There’s been nothing but complaints on other social media that the injured cadets couldn’t use their transporters to flit themselves to sickbay.

    No one seemed to have heard The Doctor say the holoemitters were out so they were short of medics.

    When I hear the same complaint over and over again, it’s clearly brigading copy pasta. I doubt most of them even watched the video clip.



  • This evokes a lot of mixed feelings.

    On one hand, I have no interest in wrestling and cringe at anything related to it. I’m also super uncomfortable about anything related to WWE making its way into the aspirational Star Trek franchise.

    When the early wrestling shows were on local television in my childhood, my parents explained it was all performance and not real sport. So, I have always associated it with a kind of fraud and grift.

    I’m always extraordinarily uneasy when young children talk about wrestling heroes as it seems an unhealthy influence. It always seems to represent a demographic that we have nothing in common with. While I’m sure some of our kids heard about WWE at school, they never expressed any interest so there was no pressure to bring anything related to it into our home — for which we were very grateful.

    So, the other hand, having this strong aversion to ‘professional wrestling’, when ‘The Rock’ Dwayne Johnson first made his dramatic acting appearance on Star Trek Voyager, I was so annoyed that I didn’t watch the episode.

    I realize now that I let my strong bias against the performance of ‘wrestling’ get in the way of assessing an actor on his own merit.

    I also recognize that Secret Hideout has been doing its best to bring in actors that will appeal to demographics that are likely to be critical of Starfleet Academy while retaining true diversity.

    So, I’m going to try to swallow my aversion and wish this woman performer success as she tries to break out of the WWE circuit.

    (I still think Paramount+ senior executives are trying to do everything they can to make our household drop our subscription.)