Communist

They are absolutely on defence and i’m aware they are around, but the mexican government is actively trying to destroy them

you really didn’t realize that the fact that they’re still around undermines, not strengthens your argument huh?

If you mean the zapatistas… duhhh? They were an anarchist movement within a country, they were attacked by the country they were founded in, and their enforcers were held in rotation and decided on by a fully public discussion that anyone in the community could attend, this is fully anarchist.

Ah yes, such trivialities like the answer to your conundrum are meaningless to someone as proudly ignorant on a topic as yourself. My bad.

See: the zapatistas and revolutionary catalonia for examples of anarchist societies.

No they’re saying the spleen harvesters are NOT anarchists at all.

A democratic power structure is decentralized.

There is a legal recourse, you’re saying someone with power ignored the law and attempted a coup… do you think coups don’t happen in non anarchist countries? How is this unique to anarchism in any way?

The same thing that happens anywhere else? A power struggle between the people who want it and don’t? Are you implying this is unique to anarchism in some way? I don’t see why it would be.

No and I don’t see how that is relevant or comparable.

usually anarchists advocate for elected or rotational positions for policing.

you simultaneously hope that no anarchist philosophers agree with you, and use a definition that says

“the advocacy or practice of anarchistic principles”

Who established anarchistic principles, exactly, if not anarchists?

the definitions in the dictionary you provided conflict, how do you explain that, if not that they are not synonyms?

but not for “anarchism”

1: a political theory holding all forms of governmental authority to be unnecessary and undesirable and advocating a society based on voluntary cooperation and free association of individuals and groups

2: the advocacy or practice of anarchistic principles

anarchy is not anarchism and the terms are not interchangeable, though they sound similar

Who created and established anarchistic principles? Anarchist thinkers and philosophers, of course

but the dictionary does use one similar to the academic definition…

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anarchism

if we use dictionary.com

“the principles or practice of anarchists”

so you’re wrong by your own source

anarchist thinkers, philosophers and academics should obviously get to define the term, no? Dictionaries are often wrong in countless ways for academic usage because the meaning of words are often more complex than can be summarized in one paragraph, dictionaries are not ultimate references, and ANYONE can create a dictionary, these are not academically primarily sourced documents these are what some guy thinks a word means based on a survey of some people who claim to, in no way shape or form should dictionaries be used in place of foundational documents and the notion that they are perfect and the best way to derive the meaning of any word is false…

both of your references are literally designed to be summaries of topics as quickly as possible, and often contain glaring inaccuracies, in academia you aren’t even allowed to cite an encyclopedia, or a dictionary, and this is for good reason.

…you deliberately want to use a definition that precisely zero anarchist philosophers or thinkers use for anarchist thought?

That seems rather… silly? How can you critique or even talk about the ideas of anarchism without using the definition anarchists actually use? Do you expect anarchists to use a different term than the one already established in the literature?

Which anarchist philosophers or anarchists agree with you?

You said you aren’t sure what isn’t perfect, I made a big list and you went “yeah but I’m fine with those imperfections” which is fine so stay with the original, but these are valid areas of improvement.

i’m not, especially the haptics and speakers suck, imo.

Hall effect everything, adaptive triggers, higher screen to body ratio, reduced weight, usb-c on top and bottom, enough performance to play spiderman 2 in particular on nice settings, 1080p, detachable siderail controllers, better haptics, better speakers. There’s honestly a lot wrong with the steam deck these things were all off the top of my head, if they fix everything on that list I won’t want any other gaming machine ever, though.

I want a second one because I know it’ll blow the first one out of the water, with the first one they had to figure out all the r&d from scratch, with the two they should be able to refine the hell out of it, I think there’s a good chance the 2 will be basically perfect. Shame they’ll never make a 3 though.

They’ve fixed the fov (although maybe I used a mod) input latency was better than before but still not perfect.