PitLoversNeedMeds

See, as opposed to resignation, there are no rules about being allowed to shame idiots online.

That’s for “at will” employment in the US. Other countries actually have rules you need to follow, both ways. The employer needs to give you a grace period, and you need to as well, under risk of penalties or invalidation of unemployment benefits.

So no, it isn’t just a “I quit” letter.

Another primo example of American exceptionalism.

Honest feedback, I’d absolutely hate it. Just like I absolutely hated all attempts to centralise shit like social media apps.

Certainly being controlled.

Do you think management grows on trees or something?

I did think most of your little pompous grouped seemed like they were sufficiently well-off to rest on your high horses and feel adequately rich to judge everyone else around you for their choices.

Either you read my original point, or you keep circling the pot and resorting to red herrings and straw-men because your fallacious ass is not rational enough to reply to the heart of the matter which I presented in my original comment.

Alright, I do seem to draw the line further than your group at the very least, but equating that with an Auschwitz example? Not cool.

So yes, I’m perfectly fine using a garbage, insane, and very probably inefficient AI in order to get a job so I can live. I’m sorry you prefer to be against it all and therefore judge anyone else not in a privileged-enough position to have a choice in the matter.

I’m sure you all have cushy jobs, that would explain a lot actually. Would be fun to do a poll on that at some point…

If you would rather stay on your pedestals and judge people because you’re above and beyond them, as you have the choice to do so, that’s your prerogative.

I give people the benefit of the doubt because I know using AI can be forced onto someone by their company if it so happens that they don’t have a choice. That’s called compassion, otherwise known as empathy. Your entire group’s reaction to my post was one of attack and derision, so I am well aware of where you all stand wrt to empathy.

I’m too stupid

We finally agree on something.

Because AI = Auschwitz, clearly an argument from a sane mind.

You’re so deep in YOUR echo chamber that you don’t see my argument for what it is lmao. I’m talking about jobs, idiot.

Keep being stubborn and facing a hiring ecological dead-zone then.

Then don’t get hired I guess? How’s your air-based diet?

I am not denying that these jobs are facing pressure now, but that’s exactly why you should conform to the demands of the job market and not be bullheaded in your denial of a tool deemed essential by so many employers to this day (even if some are finding out the hard way that it isn’t all positive).

So I stand by my point that stubborn denial of AI as a tool, and I mean a tool useful to being hired, is stupid.

The “experience” as you call it would be getting rejected by jobs that assume AI usage has become necessary.

There is no line in finding a job, it’s an existential need, you can’t live without food or water you can only buy from the money you get paid. So the “line” is moral. You’re denying job opportunities for morals 🙄…

It’s not about the idiots using them, it’s about the idiots hiring them. If you don’t conform to the job market out of sheer stubbornness you’re a fucking dumbass.

Enjoy your little echo bubble chamber, so your liwwle feewings don’t get hurt as you get left behind by people using those tools.

Not even necessarily because they’re better than you, but because management values them and people who use them, and therefore you’re choosing to leave yourself at an irrational disadvantage for no fucking reason.

You’re an idiot.

Fair enough! Thanks for the detailed write-up