• bigfondue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      They haven’t named the company yet or shown prototypes, so this is probably a couple years away. I’m on Pixel 8 right now, and I’ll probably buy the latest Pixel that can still run Graphene next time I get a new phone.

      • TheFrirish@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Honesty I would just wait it out if I were you. I really regret getting the pixel 9 (since my last phone broke).

        There is nothing new in the pixel 10 the only area that desperately needed improvement was the battery which is just as bad if not worse than the 9 and the modem still sucks. It is not fully bad but because of low reception it fights harder to get signal and therefore burns away the battery even faster.

  • k0mprssd@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    i hope grapheneos keeps supporting pixels, if possible. i liked pixels way before I discovered grapheneos due to the cameras that I still think are on top in the android world, and when I became privacy conscious it was a perfect add on to an already nice phone imo.

    • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Good camera was just a byproduct if better post processing on Google. It was true maybe 5-6 years ago that pixels had too of the line camera. But these days, even Motorola can manage a comparable camera to pixel.

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Break free, implying they won’t support Pixels anymore (is how I interpreted it at first anyway), but they are simply expanding support for more devices. 👍

  • AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    It’d be funny to me if Pixel sales tanked a significant amount and it turns out that people only used their phones for Graphene.

    Me personally, I don’t like Pixel phones. But I’ve owned every single one of them through 9 Pro.

    I look forward to a Graphene future.

    • Whulum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Typing on a pixel at the moment. I never get tired of the irony that privacy enthusiats uses google made phones of all devices out there

  • Admax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Could Fairphone count as a “Major” Android OEM ?

    They do use snapdragon chips, are priced roughly the same as the pixels, and might align the most with a project like Graphene and its values ?

    One can dream…

  • sfjvvssss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    I hope they also enhance their social media strategy, as their unprofessional and aggressive way of communication makes me question their trustworthiness more than I want, as I think the project is awesome.

      • arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        They shit on other projects all the time (frequently unprovoked, sometimes without the original conversation having anything to do about security). They also often reply with multiple posts with multiple paragraphs each when shitting on other projects. It shouldn’t take very long to find an example if you trawl through their replies on Twitter, Bluesky, or Mastodon.

        They have good points, but they’re often either not relevant to the conversation or worded in such a way that it sounds like every project other than GrapheneOS is dogshit.

        They also sometimes go on (IMO) paranoid rants about XYZ project systematically trying to destroy them or whatever.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          I got the same vibes when they describe in detail how supposedly terrible Firefox on Android is for security. I actually didn’t believe them just based on the tone.

          • arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            I mean, I think they’re right that the security is worse. I’m pretty sure it’s worse on desktop too, just not nearly as bad. Last I checked, Firefox on Android still doesn’t do per-site process isolation by default, for example.

    • jobbies@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Yep. They need an actual comms professional. I love GOS and am forever grateful to the team but having a bunch of non-nuero-typical devs speaking for them is not doing them any favours.