Is this loss?
of quality
that was the joke.jpg
Do I look like I know what a jay-peg is??
Found a version with more pixels:
JPEGs bad reputation results only from platforms automatically compressing things with very bad presets. Just saying.
im a png elitist.
I had someone in a marketing department send me a logo in a .bmp once.
I was embarrassed for them.
Obviously should have been the svg
Png is cool, but have you considered .cr2?
Doesn’t need any more JPEG
Cat 1: “Do you think we should scale up the image?”
Cat 2: “Nah, I think it’s funny when people can’t read it and get all frustrated.”
Cat 3: “I guess I’ll never know what this meme says.”
Cat 4: “JPEG!”
Repeat after me:
JPEG is for photos, PNG is for graphics.
WebP is for annoying people.
What is TIFF for?
Confusing them.
JPEG would’ve been for all, IF IT WASN’T FOR FASCIST AMERICA.
Png is for everything.
Is this loss?
No really is it? I can’t tell
It’s very lossy
The funny thing is that this is a WebP.
I bet it still takes more storage than an SVG that would even show the text properly.
So, one of the guys at work just exported graphics for one of our marketing sites as SVG, and it became a 3.5 MB monstrosity that would be orders of magnitude smaller if he had just exported it as a JPEG or even a PNG.
Well, if you are tracing the JPEG to make an SVG, instead of using the source SVG, that will happen.
Or if you try to convert an actual picture (unlike the thing in the post) into SVG.
Or if for some reason, you just have to use 50 different non-system fonts for a 4 panel.But hey, now at least you can scale it up to 9999K
