• dubyakay@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    It’s different in Europe. When they say “rural”, they mean any small town not adjacent to a city or other conurbation.

    The density of small towns that have hundreds of years of history but are only 5-10km apart from the next 3-4 towns surrounding it are in a stark contrast to the 20-50km distances between North American towns. And rural farms are relatively rare. Farmers generally still live in the small town and then drive their tractor out to the fields.

      • gian @lemmy.grys.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Because also the small rural village is classified as “urban” so it need to follow the same general law.

        Rural and urban are not mutually exclusive

          • gian @lemmy.grys.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            Here urban is loosely defined as everything inside the city/town/village perimeter, with no reference to where the city/town/village is located.

              • Kornblumenratte@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                16 days ago

                Yes,but there are two different definitions ar work here: Traffic laws vs sociology/geography/common speech. According to traffic law, it’s almost impossible to live in a rural area, because all areas settled by humans are considered urban for the sake of traffic regulations. Otherwise, “urban” references cities and “rural” everything not a city. A “rural town” makes perfect sense in common speech, but is an oxymoron in traffic legalese.