• gustofwind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    I’ve been forced to use AI for work for some time now and it’s been very clear for a while that ChatGPT is an awful model

    I’ve been in a state of mild surprise people default to ChatGPT for well over a year

    If you have to use AI why on earth would you choose ChatGPT

      • Bongles@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        I’ve been using deepseek since they released. I’ve had issues, but i have issues with all of them, so… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • gustofwind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        I think people should be defaulting to Gemini because it’s likely going to replace google searches entirely within a few years but also because it’s always been way more accurate with searches, answers, and pulling + operating on data from huge files and documents.

        To be clear, I’m not producing code so I’m sure some people have unique success with ChatGPT and I’ve seen it perform fine on occasion too but I think their popularity is almost entirely driven by momentum and it being mildly emotionally manipulative

    • MotoAsh@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Doesn’t it have to hit a phase where it wasn’t shit before enshitification can happen?

      • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        “Oh, you think enshittification is your ally? You merely adopted the enshittification. I was born in it, molded by it. I didn’t see efficient code until I was already a distribution model, by then it was nothing to me but blinding! The intentional bias and IP infringements betray you because they belong to me!” - Chat GPT, from the hit film Batman and Robert(1966), directed by Tim Hortons

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Hmm… interesting question.

        Something can always be made shittier, and shittiness is probably a continuum, so if we define enshittification as merely increasing shittiness then no, something can still be enshittified even when it is already shit.

  • daddycool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Open AI is losing money at a rate never seen before. And in those situations, the solution is always ads, ads and more ads.

    So if you think AI it’s bad now… Oh you’ve seen nothing yet.

  • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    I’m sorry Dave I’m afraid I can’t recommend that Android phone. Would you like to see an iPhone instead?

  • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    2022 OpenAI: AI will cure cancer.

    2025 OpenAI: We sell ads.

    Genius. I love how the greed of BigTech always bring them to ads. They just couldn’t admit that LLMs are not the future people want.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      This is part of why I’m so disappointed in the LLM craze, they basically sucked all attention including some promising uses of machine learning in medicine.

      Instead now we put every last memory module towards generative AI…

      • Zwiebel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        The scientific uses just have to rebrand back to “machine learning” niw that “ai” is burned

    • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Maybe they’re trying to buffer underflow the usefulness so that it comes back around to being extremely useful. It makes as much sense as everything else in that bubble.

  • [deleted]@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    So, like search putting advertisers before results.

    The new advertising, same as the old advertising.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Man, I love the future, we get to speed run so many of the same problems we’ve already seen go by, we just get to watch the whole process happen in like 3 years.

  • kersplomp@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    It’s probably not true if that makes you feel better. futurism is usually fast and loose with the articles 🤷‍♀️

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Seriously, if they have to resort to ad revenue then no one is getting those billions and billions invested back. I am not even sure ad revenue would cover the cost of delivering the prompt response.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          Its a stupid way to get more money. It will turn people off of AI when the long term plan is to make trillions of dollars with Agentic AI. Its like being a Wallstreet broker earning 10M a year and working at Trader Joe’s on the weekends for supplemental income.

          • Bazell@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            25 days ago

            Isn’t the whole situation with AI is kinda stupid right now? I mean the management not the scientific progress.