• hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      77
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because you have 2/4 general terms:

      1. Rideshare
      2. Short term rentals
      3. Crypto
      4. LLM
    • ulterno@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Uber/Lyft

      Airbnb

      Apart from the recently added surge pricing, what else is illegal about these 2?

      • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 month ago

        They literally exist as a way for tech bro libertarian idiots to circumvent laws around Taxis and Hotels because “Its totally just people rending their own stuff/time bro.”

        Like, the idea of Uber where its “we go to work along the same route,lets share a ride” is vaguely admirable, ie “rideshare” where it startrd. But its become people’s job and its literally just tsxis without the rules.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 month ago

          To be fair, they were popular at first because they were highly convenient. I remember Uber as the first to have a GPS map that told you where your taxi was. Most taxi companies and hotels were seriously lagging behind in terms of use of technology.

          That being said, they were malicious companies from the start and the whole business angle was built on taking advantage of loopholes. I’d be fine with a lot of them if they were nationally owned companies though.

          • T156@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 month ago

            They were also presented as being cheaper and more ethical. You didn’t risk being roped into paying a higher price because the cabbie deliberately took a long route, or be surprised by the price being different in person. You could order an Uber, and you’d pay only what was in the app.

        • ulterno@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Due to how much circumvention goes around here (India) anyway, Uber/Ola actually ends up being a better option overall.
          And the map feature ends up being pretty useful.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 month ago

        dependent on where you are, they are textbook skirting the law. uber got crushed when they launched in sweden because taxi drivers need to do basically the same training as bus drivers. it’s an extra letter on your license, with all that entails of age limits, theory and practical tests, x amount of time driven a year etc.

        nowadays ubers in sweden are just taxis, which hilariously means that they by law have to have a price list on the cars. which basically kneecaps their entire business model.

      • Eq0@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        Taxis and hotels used to be strongly regulated industries. For both, permits were required as well as regular checks. But Uber/Lyft/Airbnb created a system outside of the standard legal framework, allowing them to run an almost lawless business. So I wouldn’t say illegal but ethically grey.

        • ulterno@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          oic, I guess it doesn’t make much of a difference where relevant laws are either pretty lax or inadequately executed.