• hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      77
      ·
      25 days ago

      Because you have 2/4 general terms:

      1. Rideshare
      2. Short term rentals
      3. Crypto
      4. LLM
    • ulterno@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      25 days ago

      Uber/Lyft

      Airbnb

      Apart from the recently added surge pricing, what else is illegal about these 2?

      • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        24 days ago

        They literally exist as a way for tech bro libertarian idiots to circumvent laws around Taxis and Hotels because “Its totally just people rending their own stuff/time bro.”

        Like, the idea of Uber where its “we go to work along the same route,lets share a ride” is vaguely admirable, ie “rideshare” where it startrd. But its become people’s job and its literally just tsxis without the rules.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          24 days ago

          To be fair, they were popular at first because they were highly convenient. I remember Uber as the first to have a GPS map that told you where your taxi was. Most taxi companies and hotels were seriously lagging behind in terms of use of technology.

          That being said, they were malicious companies from the start and the whole business angle was built on taking advantage of loopholes. I’d be fine with a lot of them if they were nationally owned companies though.

          • T156@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            24 days ago

            They were also presented as being cheaper and more ethical. You didn’t risk being roped into paying a higher price because the cabbie deliberately took a long route, or be surprised by the price being different in person. You could order an Uber, and you’d pay only what was in the app.

        • ulterno@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          Due to how much circumvention goes around here (India) anyway, Uber/Ola actually ends up being a better option overall.
          And the map feature ends up being pretty useful.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        24 days ago

        dependent on where you are, they are textbook skirting the law. uber got crushed when they launched in sweden because taxi drivers need to do basically the same training as bus drivers. it’s an extra letter on your license, with all that entails of age limits, theory and practical tests, x amount of time driven a year etc.

        nowadays ubers in sweden are just taxis, which hilariously means that they by law have to have a price list on the cars. which basically kneecaps their entire business model.

      • Eq0@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        24 days ago

        Taxis and hotels used to be strongly regulated industries. For both, permits were required as well as regular checks. But Uber/Lyft/Airbnb created a system outside of the standard legal framework, allowing them to run an almost lawless business. So I wouldn’t say illegal but ethically grey.

        • ulterno@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          oic, I guess it doesn’t make much of a difference where relevant laws are either pretty lax or inadequately executed.

  • Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    I personally hate the “thanks to AI you now can speak to your dead relatives” ones. Especially those ones which try to spin it like a personal story for the developer of the app. Oh shut up, you would sell your own mother for money. And also you are too late to jump on that bandwagon so get lost, we have enough of you leeches.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      On a related note, I personally hate the AI partner/friend ones as well, where it’s clearly preying on the lonely, insecure, or desperate. It’s dastardly, dystopian, and frankly, quite sad. How many children’s media show rich children as being quite miserable sods whose parents think that not having friendship can be resolved by buying their kids a friend?

      You could easily see that being in a cyberpunk story, where you can rent a friend or partner from a megacorporation, but if you don’t pay the rent, they’ll be repossessed and deleted/destroyed. The data would be collected and used regardless.

  • brewery@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    23 days ago

    How about

    • reinventing trains but worse
    • rocketing amount of space launches filling up junk
    • we deliver everything but once we take over it’ll all be crap rip off products (for slave wages)
    • we deliver any food by people who can’t drive (for slave wages)
    • we’ll create algorithms to enforce society divisions and hurt mental health of children
    • we’ll take over a popular platform and make it even more disgusting and fascist
  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    Where’s “video games that you never actually own, but at least you pay to beat them”?

    Where’s “removal of a common phone feature, because if you don’t buy a $528 external DAC and a $9164 planar headphones, you’ll be okay with a pair of raycons”?

  • [object Object]@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    24 days ago

    It so happens that stuff useful for criminals is sometimes also useful for political dissidents or simply people who consider the country’s laws too oppressive. Encrypted communication is another example of this.

    • jeffep@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 days ago

      Even and especially in those cases cryptocoins are a very bad idea. Just because it’s “a” solution doesn’t mean it’s a good one

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      24 days ago

      sometimes

      and sometimes firearms are used in defense.

      do the valid reason justify the illicit reasons? you’ll certainly say they do but I’m a bit more undecided.

  • tomiant@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    25 days ago

    What would we do without capitalist innovation? Before capitalism, nothing was invented. Look at us now!

    • acantharea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      24 days ago

      Wait till you learn about their latest innovation!

      Exploiting individuals from other countries to bypass labor laws in the country of business operation via distributed outsourcing. Why even pay minimum wage in the US?

    • ozymandias@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      24 days ago

      well now we can add on: “illegal gambling on literally everything”
      and “1984 level surveillance being sold to the government instead of being done by them directly so somehow legal”
      … maybe something about giant ai networks of murder robots waging war?
      fuck why did we have to get the worst cyberpunk sci-fi future….

    • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      24 days ago

      I like this comment every time I see it posted in response to this meme. Then I hit subscribe, then I SMASH THAT BELL ICON SO YOUR MOBILEK SHIVERS WITH ECSTACY IN YOUR POCKET WHENEVER I POST AN UPDATE

  • Wilco@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    23 days ago

    Hmmm … the technology that is literally driving people insane so a few investors can make advertising money

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          23 days ago

          Not at all, the ledger is public, it’s not tied to names, only IDs but it’s trivially easy to tie a person to a Bitcoin account if they’re under surveillance

          If you live in a country that cares about law you might attract attention with a large Bitcoin balance and enough transactions to tie it to you

      • EzTerry@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        That is more a fronteir llm thing…

        I think quite a bit of what they are trying could with some optimization be run local thus no need to send entire context windows to big tech (sure this hypothetical model would know less trivia but in an agent system would be able to look it up)

        But of course big tech and other large orgs like hording all your data for profit.