To put it into perspective, the USA is making the draft system automatic from the end of this year and there’s opposition to it since the current system is that the individual is registered via the Selective Service System (it’s put into the database when one gets a driver’s license for example). From their case, the American government’s argument is: “it saves money from military recruitment campaigns” which is a pile of horse shit.
I mean, there are European countries where the draft is normal and expected for men over 18 (Austria, Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Greece, Cyprus & Croatia) including both Norway & Switzerland (despite them NOT being EU members at all). And yes: Ukraine has the draft, since men ages from 18-60 cannot leave the country due to them being made to stay behind on fending off against Russia.
But there are also European countries where the draft is non-existent, remains dormant or abolished: France, Germany, Poland, Romania, Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Bulgaria, Belgium, Netherlands, Albania, Ireland or the United Kingdom. However, what would happen if your country’s government suddenly enacts an automatic register for conscription?
As in, your country’s government refers to a name list of guys who possess EU identity cards, driver’s licenses or passports verifying if they’re over 18 by putting their name on a database. Like this: your name refered from your EU identity card now put into a conscription register meaning you can be called up at any time when the circumstances deem it necessary, like all of that done behind everyone’s back.
Unlike the USA, it’s akin to “DROP BOMBS EVERYWHERE” (evident from the previous Iraq, Afghanistan wars & the current Iran war). From Bush, Obama, Biden and include Trump in the mix. Plus they have mercenaries accompanying them. The thing is, are both PMC’s & Mercs allowed to exist in Finland or are they forbidden?
The military or defense forces by definition is to defend the nation from adversaries (like that of Finland), but the US is abusing the hell out of it just to satisfy defense contractors (as they generate revenue from weapon sales), by orchestrating wars, does it even make sense to try and convince politicians to start wars just to sell arms?
Yeah the major difference is that the US forces fight to keep a global hegemony and the military industrial complex running.
The fight we have always been preparing for is to defend against a attack from russia. There was a funny thing that happened, a Finnish military person was being interviewed by a foreign media, the guy was explaining about our defenses on the east of the country. Then the reporter asked “what if the enemy comes from the west?” and the military guy replied “well, then the enemy has made a large flanking maneuver.”
America has been protected by two massive oceans, a friendly neighbor in the north and a weak neighbor in the south. For an American to go “defend” his country means to invade another country thousands and thousands of kilometers away.
Finland has been cursed with a 1300km long border with a maniac. For a Finn to go defend his country means that he is going to be in a trench that goes through a farm that was owned by his fellow citizen. Thats a completely different perspective and attitude.
Most of the time it’s under the guise of “enforcing democracy” which is BS! More on resource extraction, like how the Gulf War during the 90s was initiated because Kuwait has oil (which Bush has monopoly on since US oil tycoons are based there) which also involved Saudi Arabia or Qatar as belligerents in the conflict.
I mean the first Gulf War was initiated because Saddam attacked Kuwait lol. Out of all the wars the US has been involved since 1945, that was the least worst. Saddam needed to be kicked in the teeth and they should have finished the job back then, not leave it up to Junior to fuck up in the 2000s.
Eugh, I feel disgusted for having to mildly defend a US military action. Why’d you make me do this?!
Vietnam on the other hand, the US military used Agent Orange (lehtikuivausaine) against their enemy but left nasty consequences after the war: pregnant mothers giving birth to kids born with defects for instance. The US military is nothing but a political tool to bully whom they consider their adversary. During both the Iraq & Afghanistan wars, was Finland neutral (not involved) or were Finnish troops deployed there?
Dont get me wrong, I have no good things to say about the US military actions and deployments. Vietnam was a atrocity, borderline genocide, a environmental crime of stupendous proportions.
Some Finnish troops were deployed in Afghanistan but didnt do much. Finland has been quite involved in peacekeeping missions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finnish_Defence_Forces#Peacekeeping_operations
Wonder why NO ONE wants to enlist in the US military? Because of the crap they were involved in, it’s stupid that the SSS exists for the last century and now Trump bringing it back to light by making the process automatic against one’s will, seriously WTF?!
If he’s really serious about bringing back a draft, the NDAA(Puolustusvaltuutuslaki) which was passed in 1980 will have to be amended first, given the nature of public opinion being in opposition of it being reinstated, it may not fly.
From what I’ve heard and seen the main motivations for Americans to join the military is the pay and getting a education (scholarship? Idk the details). Now the pay is not that good, the education doesn’t matter because things are going down the toilet anyway… And you still have to go bomb girl schools and stuff. I completely understand the reluctance to join up, forcing people to do so is not going to help either.
American war movies are ridiculous when it comes to the propagandistic messaging behind it, since most always portray them as the protagonist (Top Gun, Hurt Locker, etc). as in order for the director to get access on military hardware: the Pentagon has control on how the script (narrative) is written in exchange on letting the crew use and lend real military equipment with technical advisors on set.
It’s known as the Military Entertainment Complex (Sotilasviihdekeskus) which is the cooperation between studios and the armed forces (via the government). It’s why Tom Cruise manages to pilot a real fighter jet, for the director to have that on set: he’ll have to literally ask the US Navy. What about war movies made by Finns & set in Finland, how does the director or studio obtain military hardware?