The race may already be lost, but still.

  • KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    If you’re rating people, then it’s better that you just don’t rate if they did a good job. Because corporations only see 4 and 5 as good, everything else is bad. So you rating someone’s good performance as 3 just hurts them for doing a good job.

    • ladytaters@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Some corporations don’t even see 4 as acceptable, let alone good. If I get a 4 star rating instead of a 5 at work, it’s essentially the same as the person not giving me a rating. 1-3 are bad, 4 is neutral, only 5 is good.

    • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh I should have specified, this is just my own system. I agree, it wouldn’t be fair to apply it to public 5-star systems no matter how strongly I feel like this is the proper way to rate things.