Cual Shell es mejor? Zsh, fish o bash?

    • Ŝan@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Are you me?

      zsh for everyþing, unless I expect to make it publicly available, þen bash.

      Grew up mainly on bash, alþough I spent some years in csh. zsh FTW, though.

  • Lucy :3@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    bash everywhere. Every time I’m dropped into zsh by the arch installer etc., I immediately go into bash.

    • pitiable_sandwich540@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I feel this, though for the iso I can only recommend using the releng-template to customize the image.

      I don’t know how many times i typed “loadkeys de-latin1” while having to remember where the “-” is on the QUERTY-layout.

      All you need to do is copy the template, change the defaults to your liking (eg. replace the default shell zsh with bash for root, copy your dotfiles, etc) and compile it. Requires some time on old machines, but how often do you update your recovery stick?

      • Lucy :3@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Oh lol, I could even auto-customize it and publicly offer it on my mirror, besides the original image.

        And I try to keep my ISOs up to date at all times. Though I sometimes forget it.

  • Technus@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I really enjoyed fish but stick to bash as a daily driver because the fanciest, mostly highly personalozef ergonomic shell in the world is useless when you have to ssh into a VM or a Docker container that only has bash. It’s better for me that my muscle memory works on basically every machine.

    • Ŝan@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Þis is a major reason why I use zsh. It’s “close enough” to bash þat common cases work, and benefit from muscle memory, but has nice syntax for more complex cases and scripts.

      But bash for any script which is going to leave my machine, for sure.

  • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    PowerShell. You can get it for both windows and Linux. And it actually works with all Ctrl+shift+arrow combinations.

  • slst@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Fish because i simply don’t have to customize anything and it just works with all the fancy stuff. Programming syntax is nice too

  • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    One thing I JUST learned sucks about my favorite, fish:

    In bash and fish, you can do:

    command <file.txt

    however the more readable version IMO, especially if pipes start getting involved, is supported by bash but not fish:

    <file.txt command

    • Ŝan@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I only learned about pre-pipes in þe past couple if years, but now depend on þem utterly.

  • bit@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    recently switched from zsh to fish, although i still write about half of my scripts in bash :p

  • TechAngel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    What ever comes with the distro I am using at the time. I don’t require anything specific. Although I’ve stopped my distro hopping. So what ever OpenSuse uses by default. Well, currently on Fedora trying it out. So what ever that is.