• nialv7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    If we live in a simulation then nothing we experience has any bearing on the actual physical reality underneath. Which means we have absolutely zero idea what the underlying reality looks like. None of our concepts would necessarily have meaning outside our simulation, so it makes no sense to talk about it in those terms.

  • otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    I dunno. I feel like the fact that it’s able to reliably simulate 10[1] particles in realtime since the beginning of time, I’d guess it’s not running on Windows at least. But I also have a hard time it’s Linux because someone would always be messing with things and it would have needed to reboot for some reason or another about 6 or 7 times. Maybe the 7 days God spent building Earth was just time spent on building the server config lol.


    1. a lot ↩︎

      • tetris11@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        At the local level, yes - but I figured that was poor Earth drivers caused by spotty documentation and bitrot. At the cosmic level, it seems to run pretty clean. Uptime of a couple billion years cannot be beat, but I do wonder how they encode timestamps

    • SirActionSack@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      We would have no way of knowing what the time factor is but I think 1:1 seems highly unlikely. Much more likely that we’re running very slowly due to limits on available processing power or very fast so a civilisation can rise and fall within the observer’s lifetime.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        We’d also be entirely unaware of reboots. Our reality would just resume from the last save point and we’d just move on like nothing happened.

        • Cypher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          Reality reboots only when I’m sleeping and you can’t prove otherwise.

          When I stay up too long and start ‘hallucinating’ that’s actually the simulation breaking.

          • r00ty@kbin.life
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            No. That’s just because the thread simulating your consciousness has leaked too much memory. So when you sleep the thread saves important parts of the memory map and terminates and a new one is started with an empty memory map ready for a new “day” .

    • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      And on the 7th day, shit finally compiled, and the lord looked upon his code and found that it was mostly good enough.

  • Naz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    The simulator is OSS

    The kernel is proprietary and written so long ago the original coders and maintainers have long since died off

  • subignition@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Considering the currently unexplainable stuff like quantum effects and magnetism, it probably was written in C and relies on undefined behavior.

    • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Wait… does that mean if we can find the expected handling of unexpected input or values thrown, we can take advantage of that to gain hypervisor access to the root device? Or be able to write values directly into the memory of the system? Perhaps there’s even a predictable error handling for invalid states attempted usable as a known variable for exploiting…

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      It’s all just memory leaks. We’ll dump core soon. Nice knowing you all. xo

  • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Gonna be fucking silly here: I think the whole program is essentially self writing as it produces sentient, sapient beings, ergo, the concepts of Open and Closed Source breaks down completely.

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      How do you know? Just because the repository is hosted outside of our space-time. Doesn’t mean it’s not an open source repository.

      • tetris11@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        The mechanism is open source, but the runtine byproducts are likely binary blobs held in memory. Genetic algorithms tend to have source readable starting point, but the inbetween stages are rarely documented

  • jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    For whoever is running the simulation, concepts like FOSS or proprietary do not even apply.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Solar energy, temperate climates and a self regulation mechanism to distribute heat well, liquid and clean water, plants and animals providing nutrition, materials for anything from a clay hut to microchips…

  • solariplex@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    I’ll give it a go:

    • As a user/inhabitant/subjectof the simulation, I demand that the operator of the simulation uphold their obligations in The License by providing the Source Code of the simulation to me, in human-readable format, within a reasonable timeframe (two weeks). The source code may be conveyed via USB stick, CD, clouds in the sky, or other reasonable media.
    • Naz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago
      Request denied
      

      If you need specific and special access to universe core data, you can submit a maintainer request at:

      Universe@Core
      

      A cloned archived sectional copy might be provided upon request only containing relevant data with regards to research on a localized sector of the simulation.

    • tetris11@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Isn’t this like the tmux binary asking for the full kernel source code, despite having no means to read and comprehend it