• theolodis@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well, Airbus could also build it alone, I think the idea was to have multiple companies involved for having the profits distributed.

      • Quittenbrot@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Exactly. There never was a doubt that a company like Dassault could build such a plane alone, but that, given the Rafale experience, it is financially unviable to do so.

  • Melchior@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Just merge with some German firms and then Dassault can built it in Germany. Something like Hensoldt would be a good target.

      • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Essentially yes. The reason why the engine in a fighter jet is referred to as a power plant is that it does more than merely provide propulsion - it also generates the energy required to drive all the other systems of the plane, some of which can be pretty power hungry. Radar in particular.

        • Defectus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          That makes sense. I thought they didn’t have enough power to produce the planes. Which would be strange XD

      • tavostator@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not sure if /s, but just in case: The Gripen engine (the „power plant“) is built under license and derived from the General Electric F404 engine, which means that the US basically has a veto vote on who Sweden can sell the Gripen to. Replacing that engine with a european-built (be it Dassault or Airbus or whatever) alternative would make the Gripen a much better plane given the current state of affairs.

  • Foni@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    They may be able to, but they shouldn’t. We need a European army and that requires a military industry that stops thinking about old borders.

    • varnia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      But we all remember the desaster with the Eurofighter. Outdated and unusable for real scenarios other than reconnaissance missions since release.

      • Quittenbrot@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not sure if /s

        The EF Typhoon is in service with four large European airforces, among others, and has seen a wide range of deployments in its operational history.

  • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Of course they can. But just because they can doesn’t mean they should. They are already in a public debt crisis, why add hundreds of billions more to that.