• Machinist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’ve known several men that were proud that they didn’t read books. (Not that they read manga or anything, either.)

    One of them, in particuular, was a grown up version of a stereotypical highschool bully. Willfully ignorant doesn’t begin to describe him. I ever meet him in a dark alley, I’d fucking gut him.

    Anyhow, this behaviour (pride in ignorance) among women is rare enough that I’ve never seen it. When I was doing online dating, I had great success asking what they’re reading and using decent grammar and vocabulary.

    Anti-intellectualism and willfull ignorance have a lot to do with the situation here in the US. I think it’s mostly a male problem as well.

    • virku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Have you ever done any sort of IT support? I was internal IT in my first job and we had those people. It was mostly women 50+ years old who were proud that they know nothing about computers and would actively avoid listening when I tried to tell them how to do something trivial. Even when it was part of their jobs to do it. Then they would ask for help with the same stupid shit a few weeks later.

      • rmuk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Fucking hell, so much this. They’re so goddamn proud of their ignorance. This is why I enforce a very strict “we’re mechanics, not chauffeurs” policy in my team. We’ve got no duty - either literal or moral - to make up for incompetence.

      • Machinist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not IT support directly but I’ve had that same experience with plenty of boomer men in machine shops. They’re fucking proud that they suck at computer yet CNC has been around since the '80s in a big way.

        Ran a shop for a while and still have the terminating document from when I fired one of those fuckers.

  • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I read a lot of science fiction, and a younger friends at work frequently asked me for recommendations, and he liked talking about the books after reading them. At some point I found out that he exclusively consumes them as audiobooks, which is fine and I didn’t think much about it. Some years down the line, when I was getting ready to retire, I had to pass on things to him. There was enough of it that, in addition to working elbow-to-elbow with him, I documented all the details in some long emails. When we meet, I’d say “The details are in the email,” and focus on explaining the big picture.

    It became obvious that he never read the emails. When I talked to him about it, he admitted that he really struggles with any long block of text. The guy is really smart, and he knows a lot about a lot of things, but he gets all his info from audio and video because struggles to consume text. There’s clearly some kind of learning/mental issue going on there. It’s going to make the job tough for him, but I hope he works it out.

  • Univ3rse@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I had a coworker approach me on break and start telling me about a book he was reading and how much he was enjoying it. Towards the end, he mentioned struggling with it and that he wished someone had told him how great reading was earlier. We were both damn near 30, and it was a YA novel. I resisted the asshole urge to roast him because, shit, at least he’s trying?

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not only is he trying, he laments not learning better when he was younger. Great self-awareness, and taking ownership today.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Exactly! And not just doing it, but sticking to it AND vulnerably admitting to struggling.

        If only more people could do it.

      • PentastarM@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        My spouse always says, you don’t mock a sick person in hospital, why mock someone who is working to improve other aspects of themselves.

    • cobysev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      When I was in the US Air Force, I was deployed to a US Marine camp once, and listening to those guys chat among themselves was always a treat. You never knew what dumbass comments were going to come out of their mouths.

      One day, one of the young corporals mentioned that, while traveling to another base, he got stuck waiting for a connecting flight between bases for about a week and he was so bored, he read A BOOK. He stressed the fact that he’s never read an entire book from cover to cover before, but he did on this layover because he was so extremely bored.

      To my surprise, the other Marines just nodded along, like this made perfect sense to them. Not a single person harassed him for never reading a book before (and they harass each other all the time for the simplest things).

      I mean, we poke fun at Marines for being dumb. They call themselves jarheads, which is an allusion to the fact that their heads are as empty as a jar. But it still blows my mind to hear the dumb things they say sometimes.

      • wia@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        That’s not why Marines are called jarheads. While we do love the occasional crayon, we’re not all stupid.

        Jarhead first originated somewhere during WW2 because the high collar on some of our uniforms making it look like our heads were popping out of jars. The term has meant a few other things since then, like referencing the high and tight haircut, or being so “uptight” on their training and discipline and described as having that hat screwed on tight like the lid of a jar.

        For the record I read a lot! I love reading. My group of friends in there read a lot. We played tons of RPGs.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    As you read these comments, remember that 56% of Americans read at a 6th-grade level or above; the rest read below that.

    Please be gentle.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I recall reading somewhere that adult literacy was at like 98% in the US. Though that was like 25 years ago, and I suppose a 6th grade level still counts as “literate”? Or did we slide backwards?

      If we have to talk about this in terms of “grade levels”, at what point is someone actually considered illiterate?

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zipBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Measuring two different things. Your number: can read the words, mostly understand the words they read.

        6th graders are generally literate. However, they’re not necessarily picking up on nuance, or subtleties. And they will often not take into account how the sentence they just read fits into the overall context of the piece, and they likely won’t question the narrator, assuming they’re reliable.

        You can imagine how half of adults being that bad at these things has colored political discourse.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s a book with chapters. Basically a regular ass book. When kids are real little, their books are like 15 pages long. Then in like 1st or 2nd grade, they move onto reading big kid books - aka “chapter books” that have enough pages to warrant chapters.

      You never hear someone over the age of 7 or 8 mention reading “chapter books” because they’re just know as books.

      Except anon, who is dumb as fuck.

      • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Anon could be a kid. On the internet nobody knows you’re a dog. Actually, a lot of content on 4chan looks like a giggling 8 year old posted it; especially the posts about poop.

      • Flipper@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        There are regular books that don’t have any chapters. Most of Terry Pratchett’s Discworld Books are an example of this.

        • adhocfungus@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          That threw me when I started Guards! Guards!. I generally only have time to read at night and stop at the first chapter break after 11:00. For several nights in a row I was reading until midnight, giving up, then forgetting by the next time. Eventually I checked ahead and realized there weren’t any, but a lot of his ‘sections’ are chapter sized, so it works out.

    • Stupidmanager@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Most adults just call them ‘books’. But in case you want more, it’s a book with chapters like “Chapter 1 - in the beginning’ and so on. Very few pictures, lots of words. in the US, youth call them chapter books because it’s a moment of transition from reading short simple stories to books more than 100 pages long.

  • binarytobis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    No one’s talking about anon’s weird assumption that authors go from idea directly to manga, and not that most authors start by writing a novel to attract a sponsor.

  • RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I assume it’s similar how I can’t get in to manga, but I can enjoy a novel or animated stuff. Just can’t seem to enjoy those black and white squares with questionable art in them. Just doesn’t speak to me.

    • misery mansion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Have you tried any that are criticallyhighly regarded? I certainly wouldn’t describe the art in Akira or any of Otomo’s books as “questionable”. Obviously there’s cheaper stuff out there but there is extremely high quality Manga.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Also a lot of the more big name manga are shonen which can run the range of of “questionable” which makes it harder for westerners to get into. While seinen for example generally doesn’t have as much fan service overall but its often times not as much or it is recontextualized as bad, for example that horse in Bezerk.