• dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      It’s different in Europe. When they say “rural”, they mean any small town not adjacent to a city or other conurbation.

      The density of small towns that have hundreds of years of history but are only 5-10km apart from the next 3-4 towns surrounding it are in a stark contrast to the 20-50km distances between North American towns. And rural farms are relatively rare. Farmers generally still live in the small town and then drive their tractor out to the fields.

        • gian @lemmy.grys.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Because also the small rural village is classified as “urban” so it need to follow the same general law.

          Rural and urban are not mutually exclusive

            • gian @lemmy.grys.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              Here urban is loosely defined as everything inside the city/town/village perimeter, with no reference to where the city/town/village is located.

                • Kornblumenratte@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  Yes,but there are two different definitions ar work here: Traffic laws vs sociology/geography/common speech. According to traffic law, it’s almost impossible to live in a rural area, because all areas settled by humans are considered urban for the sake of traffic regulations. Otherwise, “urban” references cities and “rural” everything not a city. A “rural town” makes perfect sense in common speech, but is an oxymoron in traffic legalese.