Luffy@lemmy.ml to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 days agoapparently, the T button dosent exist for some peoplelemmy.mlimagemessage-square256linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageapparently, the T button dosent exist for some peoplelemmy.mlLuffy@lemmy.ml to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 days agomessage-square256linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareinsufferableninja@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 days agoGood for you. The rest of us find it annoying
minus-squaredreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 days agoI found him: the one who speaks for everyone!
minus-squarestephen01king@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 days agoHe’s not speaking on behalf of you, so by definition he is not speaking for everyone. Unless, you are actually a dog on the internet. Are you?
minus-squareStupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 days agoCliché but: user name checks out.
minus-squarestephen01king@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 days agoIt’s actually the opposite, since his name did not contain the word insufferable, only sufferable. If you read the ‘Im’ as I’m, that means he is a self-professed sufferable ninja.
minus-squareStupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 days agoLOL true! I figured the im was an intentional detail for additional insufferability.
minus-squareTeddE@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 days agoI’m normally happy to grant that - but not while they’re literally putting someone else down for doing effectively the same thing.
Good for you. The rest of us find it annoying
I found him: the one who speaks for everyone!
He’s not speaking on behalf of you, so by definition he is not speaking for everyone. Unless, you are actually a dog on the internet. Are you?
Cliché but: user name checks out.
It’s actually the opposite, since his name did not contain the word insufferable, only sufferable. If you read the ‘Im’ as I’m, that means he is a self-professed sufferable ninja.
LOL true! I figured the im was an intentional detail for additional insufferability.
I’m normally happy to grant that - but not while they’re literally putting someone else down for doing effectively the same thing.