I clearly explained the distinction despite not using the term “forced inclusion,” which I didn’t raise. You did. I can’t reply qualitatively unless you explain which part confuses you.
Agreed. People should dislike modern Star Trek for it’s bad writing, not because it’s progressive.
I didn’t raise the topic. I replied to it. I presume you can see that comment? Are you using an application which truncates the discussion? If you disagree with something, feel free to tell me what :)
I think it did. If you disagree please tell me how. I provided two examples.
Your two examples didn’t explain what “forced inclusion” means and what makes it different from regular inclusion.
“Nuh uh” isn’t an argument. If you won’t read the comment then I won’t be able to give you a meaningful reply.
Your examples provided made no mention of “forced inclusion” or what makes it different from regular inclusion.
I clearly explained the distinction despite not using the term “forced inclusion,” which I didn’t raise. You did. I can’t reply qualitatively unless you explain which part confuses you.
…this you?
What does “forced inclusion” mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion?
Yes, in response to this comment.
I didn’t raise the topic. I replied to it. I presume you can see that comment? Are you using an application which truncates the discussion? If you disagree with something, feel free to tell me what :)
You introduced the term “forced inclusion”. What does that term mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion?