If you’re rating people, then it’s better that you just don’t rate if they did a good job. Because corporations only see 4 and 5 as good, everything else is bad. So you rating someone’s good performance as 3 just hurts them for doing a good job.
Some corporations don’t even see 4 as acceptable, let alone good. If I get a 4 star rating instead of a 5 at work, it’s essentially the same as the person not giving me a rating. 1-3 are bad, 4 is neutral, only 5 is good.
Oh I should have specified, this is just my own system. I agree, it wouldn’t be fair to apply it to public 5-star systems no matter how strongly I feel like this is the proper way to rate things.
I have a very similar system only from a subjective personal angle:
So most get 3, some get 2 or 4, only the few special ones get 1 or 5.
If you’re rating people, then it’s better that you just don’t rate if they did a good job. Because corporations only see 4 and 5 as good, everything else is bad. So you rating someone’s good performance as 3 just hurts them for doing a good job.
Some corporations don’t even see 4 as acceptable, let alone good. If I get a 4 star rating instead of a 5 at work, it’s essentially the same as the person not giving me a rating. 1-3 are bad, 4 is neutral, only 5 is good.
Oh I should have specified, this is just my own system. I agree, it wouldn’t be fair to apply it to public 5-star systems no matter how strongly I feel like this is the proper way to rate things.
Okay sweet!