• tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This not only affects vegetarian food, but also salmon steak for example.

    Where are you getting this from? In the document you linked they define meat as “edible parts of the animals” and I can’t find any wording in here that would exclude fish from being meat.

    • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Afaik fish is not considered meat, definitely not in colloquial language. With a quick search I found another EU article which mentions meat and fish, and they list meat and fishery products as being different things: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/hygiene-rules-for-food-of-animal-origin.html

      What that article includes under meat: “Meat, including domestic ungulates (bovine, porcine, ovine and caprine species); poultry and lagomorphs (farmed birds, rabbits, hares and rodents); farmed and wild game; minced meat, meat preparations and mechanically separated/recovered meat; and meat products.”

    • Ferk@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I mean… if they meant “meat” literally as flesh/muscle fiber, then eggs would not meet the definition either.

      However, wouldn’t that definition also technically mean that milk can also be categorized as a meat product? Same for honey. Someone also mentioned peanut butter in another comment, is butter considered meat as well since it often comes from milk?

      And what about broth/stock? …chicken stock is common, does that mean that now it should be considered a meat product and you can no longer have vegetable stock?