• supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    I agree under the condition that the Microsoft CEO refers to shareholders in all public PR as “Daddy” for all of 2026.

    • ZDL@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Some of us—those educated when language was actually still taught in school—use em-dashes for their correct purpose. I refuse to stop using correct punctuation because some jackass somewhere on the Innarwebtubes will call it LLMbecile slop. That’s a them problem, not a me problem.

    • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      While the article could very well be slop (and I’m not defending it either way, also fuck the CEO of microsoft), it’s very common for (actual) journalists to use the emdash, that’s where the models likely picked it up from to begin with. I hesitate to use the emdash alone as an indicator for slop. When it’s paired with lists, lots of bold, over embellishments, and common slop phrases (“but here’s the thing”, “everything changed”, “marking a pivotal moment”, “the transformative power”, “further enhancing”, “pivotal”, etc), then I start to think that it’s LLM slop. Wikipedia has a great page on how to spot common slop. It also mentions that one of these is not necessarily a sign of slop, but when there’s a lot of these together it definitely can be.

      The statement from the CEO is almost certainly LLM slop.

    • azolus@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      The biggest injustice I had to endure due to AI is my proud keyboard setup which enabled me to use emdashes and correct quotation marks liberally becoming useless unless I want ppl to think it’s AI writing…

  • RegularJoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    OK, stop calling it A.I. slop. We can choose from:

    • A.I. dreck

    • A.I. junk

    • A.I. muck

    • A.I. offal

    • A.I. rubbish

    • A.I. sewage

    • A.I. trash

    • A.I. waste

    …better?

    • LostWanderer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      When the people are pissed to the point of no return, I’m mad and ready to break a computer that has AI installed on it. The billionaires couldn’t hope to stop millions upon millions of angry people from breaking their resource hogging and slop making tools.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Mr Nadalla is human slop. None of his words are truthful. Hes spinning a narrative purely because the results benefit him.

    He should stop talking and show us something. Prove that AI is good. So.far every demonstration has been fake and every real world test has failed.

  • Jared White ✌️ [HWC]@humansare.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    It’s not shocking he would make such dumb statements, but it is rather shocking that the “quality” of the writing here is so incredibly poor. I mean, my expectations of CEO thought pieces are pretty low, but this doesn’t even meet that low bar. 😂

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      It was probably written by Copilot. AI is bad in its various ways, but there’s degrees of difference between the offerings. Copilot is bottom as far as I’m concerned. It can’t do simple language stuff that an LLM should be able to do. That’s why he’s the upset one, people have stopped bothering with his brand AI.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Stop calling LLMs ‘AI’, there’s nothing intelligent about regurgitating statistically luke-warm refried Reddit threads.

    • ZDL@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Nothing ever in the history of AI studies has been “true intelligence”. There’s a good reason for this. We can’t even define what “intelligence” means in any systematically sound way.