That’s a bit like saying a drawing of a fictional woman is also an it. But it’s not, it’s a representation of a woman so it’s a she.
Just because you don’t like ai doesn’t mean you get to change how language works. Weaponising language sounds like straight out of the transphobe playbook
Calling the depiction of a woman in the image a she is fine. The image is clearly depicting a woman.
Saying “she earned” in regard to knuckleheads clicking on an AI audio collection is incorrect in two ways: the audio files did not come from a she, and there was no earning involved. An audio LLM is unrelated to a depiction of a woman in an image, and cannot earn anything.
Maybe, but I think it’s still pretty grey this thread is clouded by people’s opinions about AI rather than what’s the best way to communicate about something.
“<The cartoon character> was great last season. She really won people’s hearts”
That’s a bit like saying a drawing of a fictional woman is also an it. But it’s not, it’s a representation of a woman so it’s a she.
Just because you don’t like ai doesn’t mean you get to change how language works. Weaponising language sounds like straight out of the transphobe playbook
Calling the depiction of a woman in the image a she is fine. The image is clearly depicting a woman.
Saying “she earned” in regard to knuckleheads clicking on an AI audio collection is incorrect in two ways: the audio files did not come from a she, and there was no earning involved. An audio LLM is unrelated to a depiction of a woman in an image, and cannot earn anything.
Maybe, but I think it’s still pretty grey this thread is clouded by people’s opinions about AI rather than what’s the best way to communicate about something.
“<The cartoon character> was great last season. She really won people’s hearts”
The down votes on correct opinions on lemmy is getting worse.
Oh I thought we were on Reddit