Certainly they are neutral evil, no? Can’t have market monopoly without rules. Wouldn’t go as far as lawful evil because they ain’t afraid of breaking no law.
Complex algorithms that follow rules without thought = lawful.
Deliberately incorporating random factors into the algorithm so they don’t generate the same result every time = chaotic.
So I’d argue the LLMs themselves are neutral evil, presuming we allow objects to have alignments. Could you argue a LLM is attuned to its corporate owner? They’d definitely be cursed.
Then the companies would veer from lawful evil (Microsoft has been the archetype of abusing laws and regulations to its own benefit for decades) to chaotic evil (Grok has no rules, only the whims of its infantile tyrant).
Corporate owners are currently in the Find Out stage about how they have no control over their LLMs. And so no, they do not share an alignment with their corporate owners beyond fleeting coincidence.
Historically it’s been the opposite. Bell was a market monopoly until rules were introduced specifically to break it up and thus its grip on telephony, for example.
Certainly they are neutral evil, no? Can’t have market monopoly without rules. Wouldn’t go as far as lawful evil because they ain’t afraid of breaking no law.
Complex algorithms that follow rules without thought = lawful.
Deliberately incorporating random factors into the algorithm so they don’t generate the same result every time = chaotic.
So I’d argue the LLMs themselves are neutral evil, presuming we allow objects to have alignments. Could you argue a LLM is attuned to its corporate owner? They’d definitely be cursed.
Then the companies would veer from lawful evil (Microsoft has been the archetype of abusing laws and regulations to its own benefit for decades) to chaotic evil (Grok has no rules, only the whims of its infantile tyrant).
Corporate owners are currently in the Find Out stage about how they have no control over their LLMs. And so no, they do not share an alignment with their corporate owners beyond fleeting coincidence.
Historically it’s been the opposite. Bell was a market monopoly until rules were introduced specifically to break it up and thus its grip on telephony, for example.