Spotify is going to get its ass sued into oblivion. Music estates, RIAA, and record companies do not fuck around.

  • BakerBagel@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I would be in serious trouble if i let my brother run a meth lab out of my storage unit outside of town. If Spotify is allowing people to post that content, they should be held liable.

    • Turret3857@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Slippery slope with this one. At least in the US. It’s known as the safe harbor law, and without it indie sites like Lemmy instances, Peertube, other ActivityPub software and a whole slew of other sites just wouldnt be able to exist due to the sheer amount of corporate bullying that could happen.

      I am NOT saying that Spotify should not see public backlash, nor am I saying that Spotify should be allowing this to happen. The analogy that you have provided though would imply that all websites should be responsible for their users actions. That would allow people to completely bankrupt any website by uploading a bunch of Disney movies.

      There should be some sort of regulation or safeguard in place. I do agree with that.

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Spotify is fairly tight about who they allow to upload music. Spotify doesn’t act like an open forum, it is a controlled market where they act as a middleman between the listener and the rights holder of the media. A party you have a commercial contract with is using your resources for financial gain.